ARRESTING
OUR FATE UNDER FEMINISM
Feminism
has so much become an accepted part of the psyche of American society that when
a man holds to the principles upon which this nation was established, he is instantly
slandered as an archaic male chauvinist bigot. But a look at history during and since the founding of this
nation reveals that we today have indeed become so subnormal concerning the
proper order and place of men and women, that when someone actually becomes
normal, they appear abnormal. All
one has to do is look at the order of society at our founding as a nation and
observe its fruit, then compare it with the societal order we have today and
its fruit, and the evidence as to what is right is starkly obvious!
John
Adams, one of our founding fathers, one of five men appointed to draft the
Declaration of Independence, and America’s first Vice President and
second President, astutely warned:
Our Constitution was made only for a moral and
religious people. It is wholly
inadequate for the government of any other.
Equally,
the first President of our nation, George Washington, warned:
Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to
political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports.
Like
a rebellious teenager caught up in the loose, irresponsible, fancy-free pop
culture, we as a nation are gravely foolish having ignored these warnings and
disregarded the inevitable consequences.
We as a nation are neither moral nor religious!
What
then is the cause for and the solution to our foolishness? Unfortunately, all that men try to do
today in our utterly failing society is to place bandages or a topical dressing
on our deep causative afflictions, and in fact do nothing to truly reverse the
inevitable. We’re a ship
headed for certain disaster, but are too much caught up in revelous pleasure to
forthrightly alter the glaringly destructive course. Following in the ways of Sodom and Gomorrah of old, we too
are seduced and blinded by the “arrogance, abundant food, and careless
ease” of our own waywardness.
We as a nation are drunk on pleasure, irresponsible, and our vain
obsession with personal rights, otherwise known as greed, will most certainly
further effect our ruin!
The
cause for our foolishness is that we have abandoned the principles, practices,
and beliefs upon which this nation was founded; and the only solution is to
forthrightly and fearfully return to them. This will take major changes in our present-day highly
feminized society.
How
did this fateful abandonment take place?
Ever so gradually we moved the line away from what was held to be true
and right, in small increments compromising on many vital issues until we are
now miles away from where we were.
Society has not had the foresight to see where this ill course will take
each succeeding generation; and even so, unless each generation experiences the
full consequences, that’s only left for another generation to endure. Ironically, each generation thinks that
the next generation is the one that has departed and strayed, not realizing
their own part in our nation’s successive demise. But if we look back at life before
1920, we can see what we have left.
Let’s now examine one example of this fateful departure – education.
Our
schools today are designed to destroy social, moral, and religious values,
overturn the established role of men and women, and are in fact a cesspool of
ill and destructive influences.
For two hundred years – throughout the latter 1600s, 1700s, and
into the 1800s – our nation’s colleges were exclusively for
men. It was not until 1850, when
the feminist movement began to be more prominently evidenced, that colleges
began experimenting with coeducation, placing young men and women in the same
educational facilities. Thereby,
the critical line of distinction between men and women began its fateful drift
away from the sound causative founding principles of this nation. Evidenced in many ways, including this
incremental destruction of our education system, the women’s rights
movement continually proves to be the most destructive and greatest enemy to
mankind on the face of the earth!
The
very fact that co-education began reveals the true aspirations of feminism
– for the woman to be equal to the man, “co” meaning
equal. As addressed in The
Curse of 1920, this is the curse
of the woman that is rooted all the way back in the original Garden of Eden
– “your desire will be for [the place of] your husband”
(Genesis 3:16). Women continue to
seek that forbidden fruit that is a delight to the eyes and promises to make
one wise, yet leads to death! And
frankly, irregardless of whether you believe in the Bible or not, this matter
of feminism is entirely rooted in the spiritual. The women’s rights movement is uncategorically
Eveonian – of or characteristic of Eve!
What
has this feminization of education produced? What is its fruit? … Destruction! How do we count the ways? … Where
does one begin?
First,
placing young men and women in the same educational facilities is guaranteed
disaster! The mere fact of placing
them in education as equals is the first step down the road of error,
confusion, and compromise. Men and
women are not equal in any way.
Governmentally, by God’s design and order the man is to rule over
the woman – in the home, as well as civilly. Likewise, he is to be the provider. Learning-wise, it is proven that boys
learn better from men, and girls learn better from women. Physically, the man is twice as strong
as the woman. Socially, men are
more independent, resourceful, willing to make it on their own; whereas women
look for their Prince Charming, the one who will help them. This difference is why feminized
government has produced a burgeoning welfare mentality. Emotionally, the man is more logical,
whereas the woman is more emotional.
Educationally, men and women have differing strengths and weaknesses, as
well as differing needs for preparatory skills and training. To place the two together in latter
developmental and preparatory educational facilities muddies these divine
differences and begins a course of homosexuality (one and the same sex) and
error.
Having
noted this though, it is important to realize that feminism is not relegated
solely to women, but equally affects men.
Men and women alike can express feminization. In fact, some women
are more masculine in their thinking, attitudes, beliefs, and actions
than some men.
One
of the gravest errors associated with our entirely failed education system is
the guaranteed failure of taking young men and women who are now wired and
plumbed for marriage and bearing children, and throw them into the distracting
mix of unprofitable and destructive companionship. What again was the example given to us by our founding
fathers? Young men who went to
college did so to gain specific training that prepared them for employment and
societal benefit. They were not
distracted by “dating” and like female distractions. Young men today finish high school and
go off to college at the age when these same men in earlier times had already
completed college and were ready to establish a family and career.
Today,
our education system drags out education so far that it is entirely
unnatural. At the very age when
young men and women should be establishing a family, we ship them off alone to
be exposed to immoral liberal women’s-rights-tailored coed
facilities. Education today must
return to being tailored to the biological clock of puberty so that when men
and women are capable of producing children, their education is near
completion. To place fully
sexually equipped young men and women together for a duration that is unnatural
for the human body, is socially and morally irresponsible and entirely contrary
to building solid homes and families.
Instead of training young men and women for stable families, our present
education system trains them that relationships are short-term and meant for
self-gratification. Instead of
fostering lifelong commitments, relationships are reduced to one-night
stands. At the close of
one’s life, what is it that is most important but one’s
family. Yet our education system
is not only oblivious to the fulfillment of this ultimate valued quest and does
not support it, but it in fact seeks to derail and destroy the family. Secondary and, particularly,
post-secondary education today is, by its very nature, entirely anti-family.
Add
to this the horrendous ills of our immoral entertainment and advertising
industries, as well as the aberrant liberal standards that have come to us
through feminism whereby moral social standards are thrown out and all that
matters is beastly pleasure, coed facilities are simply breeding grounds of
moral destruction. And as
Washington, Adams, and others sternly warned, morality and religion are
indispensable for a healthy and enduring America, neither of which we now
possess.
The
wisdom of Solomon regarding our present education system was succinctly
expressed when he wrote:
Rejoice, young man, during your childhood, and let
your heart be pleasant during the days of young manhood. And follow the impulses of your heart
and the desires of your eyes. Yet
know that God will bring you to judgment for all these things [Ecclesiastes 11:9].
God
will not be mocked regarding this warning or our foolish pleasure-seeking
actions, any more than the warnings of Washington or Adams will be mocked as
well. Fools alone despise these
weighty matters!
In
similar regard, repeated throughout the writings of Solomon is what can be
called the trinity of truth. What would you think if I told you that
the trinity of truth was the following:
First gain knowledge; thereby, one can then secure
understanding; and with that understanding comes wisdom?
Would
you agree with this? If so, you
are tragically wrong! Solomon
consistently set forth the opposite order for securing truth:
First seek wisdom; upon gaining wisdom, then one
secures understanding; and with right understanding one can then gain true
knowledge.
Otherwise,
when the knowledge one gains is wrong, such as that which the Eveonian
women’s rights movement has so successfully fed to us, then understanding
is false, which we so plainly see evidenced today, and wisdom is false. This is the recipe for error, the very
error clearly evidenced in our education system.
Our
nation has forsaken the wisdom of our founding fathers and tragically erred by
making the pursuit of knowledge foremost, preeminent, and forcing scholastic
education to be unnaturally extended far beyond puberty. “Knowledge first” is
backwards, and is not truth. Truth
only comes through first seeking and applying wisdom; and wisdom does not allow
the entirely destructive education system we have today.
In
the opening, we noted that in order to see whether our founding fathers or we
today are correct, all one has to do is look at the order of society at our
founding as a nation and observe its fruit, then compare it with the societal
order we have today and its fruit.
The evidence is both obvious and overwhelming!
While
our founding education system produced the wisdom and valor exhibited in our
nation’s formative years – the product of the Age of Enlightenment
– the opposite is true with the coeducation system after the 1850s that
arose out of the Eveonian women’s rights movement. The women’s rights movement was
indeed the pivotal change that has brought our nation’s downhill race
towards error and destruction.
Here are just some of its ill destructive fruit.
and
read Bob Unruh’s article at:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53824.)
Most
certainly, other destructive fruit could be added to this list. Feminized coeducation facilities for
young men and women are a failed system all the way around – socially,
morally, educationally, governmentally, and economically! It is recognized that factors other
than coeducation are in play here as well. But even so, our coed system, compliments of the Eveonian
women’s rights movement, is a major contributor and is symptomatic of
these like faults today.
Providing
a personal testimony, Dan Brown recently published The Great Expectations
School: A Rookie Year in the New Blackboard Jungle, in which he recounts what he terms a
"brutal" year as a Teaching Assistant. "As a rookie,” said Dan, “I was given my
own classroom, in part because there weren't any male teachers for that
grade."
Dan began teaching fourth grade at Public School 85 in the
Bronx. "Only two kids out of
the 26 had parents who were married," he said. (This too is the product of feminization, which provided an
entirely anti-family matriarchal welfare system.) "Most of these kids had no father figure at home. To come to school and have that male
authority figure who was treating them respectfully made a huge
difference."
He
spent the better part of the year trying to connect with his students and serve
as a male role model. "I had
to be an agent of good with them," he said. "Many of them lead exceptionally difficult lives. They've been abandoned.” “Some kids, especially boys,
connect more with male teachers," reaffirmed Dan. But many of his students had never had
a male teacher. "It made a
difference that I was a man,” he said. “It was just a different kind of classroom
environment, a different vibe.
Some female teachers are maternal toward their students; I wasn't. I expected a lot from them."
Reg
Weaver, president of the NEA, admits, "There's a lack of support for male
teachers, a lack of respect, and a lack of being able to be involved in
decision-making. And I can't say
it's getting better."
If
the president of NEA is willing to admit this, one has to wonder then how bad
it really is. To help understand,
let’s consider the experience of Brian Simpson (a pseudonym used to
protect himself).
Brian
has been supply teaching – providing short term or temporary teaching
– for twenty years in every subject area, K-12, in over 200 schools and
in over 1,000 classrooms in a large Canadian city. From his extensive experience he relates, “I can
report that the education system has been taken over by feminists and lesbians
who preach a daily diet of hate, violence and discrimination against males
despite pretenses of ‘tolerance,’ ‘non violence,’ and
‘inclusiveness.’”
He notes, “In one classroom in which Grade-12 students were nearing
their graduation, I had a boy cry about the climate of ever-climaxing anti-male
hate.”
“As
a male, I am routinely discriminated against for employment with no recourse to
authorities,” continues Brian, who labels this as nothing less than
routine “gender cleansing.”
In further personal assessment, he adds, “First of all, to be in
teaching is to be immersed in femininity.
Wall-to-wall women, everywhere; the students, the teaching staff, the
curriculum, the posters on walls, the celebrations, the laments, the teacher
unions, the student unions, the union unions. In perfect lock-step, all are one, and half of humanity
counts for nothing, except to be harmed, of course.” His conclusion after twenty years of
teaching: "No thanks for the disrespect and hate."
And
they wonder why there are not more male teachers? The reason is obvious – what man wants to take his
masculine qualities of respect, authority, accountability, and discipline, and
make them subservient to a matriarchal feminized education mentality and
rulership? It’s against a
man’s conscience and his God-given ways; therefore men stay away from
this off-base, out-of-touch, mismanaged, failed system. If you can’t be a real man, then
why even try? Hey, you don’t
find men wanting to wear women’s dresses!
Clearly,
the only way this nation can restore and revitalize education is to return to
the masculine principles and practices of our founding fathers. Feminism has utterly failed!
But
let’s now take this aberrant Eveonian social matter one vital step
further. Let’s say that
America wakes up and repents of her grave error and reverses this insane
practice of coeducation facilities for young men and women and unnaturally
extending education – then what’s next for them? These same young men and women, many
who marry, will then go into a work environment equally ordered by the Eveonian
women’s rights movement where men and women are placed together in
sex-charged, glamorized working environments that are ripe for the occupational
hazard of having an affair.
In 1900, women made up only 18% of this nation's workforce, and
the divorce rate was 0.7 divorces per 1,000 population (55, 751 divorces). But by 1947, because of World War II,
women in the workforce increased to 28%, and the divorce rate more than tripled
to about 2.5 (around 349,000 divorces)!
By 1980, 42.5% of the nation's workers were women, and the divorce rate
continued to rise with these increases to almost seven and one-half times that
of 1900, or 5.2 (1,182,000 divorces)!
In 2006, the number of women workers was 46% of the workforce, but the
divorce rate had decreased to around 3.6.
Unfortunately, much of this decrease was due to the dramatic decrease in
marriages and increase in live-in relationships. In 1980, the marriage rate was 10.6; but by 2006, that rate
had fallen to around 7.5. Thus, we
see clearly evidenced that as women entered into the man’s world of
laboring outside the home, the inevitable outcome was the home’s
destruction!
Of course there are other contributing factors for this elevated
divorce rate, including the feminization of our court system and divorce laws
that invite women to file for divorce and extort their husband’s accrued
wealth and take his children.
Tellingly, three-fourths of all divorces are filed by women! Our nation has evidenced the tragic
transformation from a patriarchal system given to us by our forefathers –
(1) the supremacy of the father in the family, (2) the legal dependence of
wives and children, and (3) the reckoning of descent and inheritance in the
male line – to becoming a destructive and usurping matriarchal system
decried by our forefathers.
Many
years ago in a very common way I learned a very important truth, and that is: familiarity
leads to error! The more familiar or casual one becomes
with a situation or individual, the more likely they are to err. Having a familiar or casual
relationship drops essential defenses and respect for proper governmental order
and lines of separation, and thereby must be guarded. Likewise, it is only natural that the more one is exposed to
temptation, the more likely they will succumb to it. In their Eveonian desire to be equal with men, the
women’s rights movement expanded women into the workforce, as well as
into education, with the same ill results that Eve brought – destruction!
Another
founding father, Thomas Jefferson, the principal author of the Declaration of
Independence and our second Vice President and third President, had much to say
concerning the proper role and place of women. During his time, America wisely had strict lines of
distinction between the sexes – in society, in education, and in
government. When Jefferson was an
envoy to France, he wrote Washington concerning the deplorable state of
casualness found in that country:
The manners of the nation allow them [women] to
visit, alone, all persons in office, to solicit the affairs of the husband,
family, or friends, and their solicitations bid defiance to laws and
regulation...[Few Americans] can possibly understand the desperate state which
things are reduced in this country from the omnipotence of an influence which,
fortunately for the happiness of the sex itself, does not endeavor to extend
itself in our country beyond the domestic line.
Today,
this rightly observed separation is tragically violated. Jefferson objected to the entrance of
women into the role of government and governing, clearly stating that in order
“to prevent depravation of morals and ambiguity of issue, [women] could
not mix promiscuously in the public meetings of men.”
Again,
what is the trinity of truth?
Wisdom, understanding, and knowledge. Here we find clearly stated the wisdom of our founding
fathers – that women promiscuously mixing with men in government,
education, or work, causes “depravation of morals and ambiguity of
issue”!
This
is in every regard the exact ill fruit we so fully see evidenced today,
concerning which Jefferson forewarned.
Our government has become feminized, and thereby is a dismal bloated
distracted failure. Our places of
work have become weakened and distracted and just as much a threat to the
family and the home as our coeducation facilities of secondary and
post-secondary education. They are
two of the same thing. Whether it
be in the home, in the schools, in the workplace, in government, or in the
church, equality for women is entirely destructive in its effects, causing
ambiguity in issues that are vital to this nation’s wellbeing, and the
depravation of morals that Washington and Adams warned are indispensable. Clearly, the Eveonian women’s
rights movement has been the single most causative factor in our nation’s
demise. The curse of the woman
desiring the place of the man has once again effected its death!
The
trinity of truth is wisdom, understanding, and knowledge, and wisdom tells us
to listen to Washington, Adams, and Jefferson, thereby to gain understanding,
and with true knowledge to change both our educational institutions, as well as
our workplaces. In short, women
need to return to their homes and be faithful wives and mothers. As stated earlier, the Eveonian
women’s rights movement is the most destructive and greatest enemy to
mankind on the face of the earth, and it must be reversed! Any nation that fails to seek religion
and morals first will fail! That
is our course, … and our fate – unless we change!
If
you think America is doing so well as a nation and that none of this moral junk
or these chauvinistic concerns about feminism are relevant, you have your head
in the clouds. Once again from the
wisdom of Solomon we read, “the borrower [is] servant to the
lender” (Proverb 22:7). The
United States is clearly the servant to others who are in fact more righteous
than we. The U.S. debt at this
time (2008) is $9.2 trillion, $500 billion more than last year, and is on a
steeply escalating course!
Much
of this debt is owed to nations like Japan, China, and Saudi Arabia. Look at the moral values of China. They at least seek to control the
propagation of lewd behavior. Look
at the moral values of Saudi Arabia.
They have clear lines of distinction between men and women and have high
standards of modesty and intolerance for crime and immorality. Likewise, Japan is more righteous than
we. If America is so great, then
why is it that we are debtors to these nations that are so much more righteous
than we? God has favored these nations and we in
feminized America are now their slave.
And if any of these nations chose to call in their notes, our economy
would crumble like a house of cards!
The mere mention of such an act causes seismic shockwaves on Wall
Street, dropping the Dow like a lead balloon.
In
conclusion, once again we turn to the wisdom of a founding father, Thomas
Jefferson. May we – we must
– uphold the principles and truths delivered to us by these men,
including preserving the line of distinction between men and women. And let it be noted that it is not
without meaning, and something we should earnestly take to heart, that America
had no founding mothers. Neither
are the Patriarchs of the Bible nor in any great religion women. Nor were any of Yahshua’s twelve
disciples women. We have abandoned
the ways that were given to us in wisdom.
Therefore, Jefferson soberingly forewarned:
And can the liberties of a nation be thought
secure if we have removed their only firm basis: a conviction in the minds of men that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but
with His wrath? Indeed, I
tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just; that His justice cannot
sleep forever.
E-Mail your comments or ask to be notified of
future publications